🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families want additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.